Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
Knowledge of mange among Masai pastoralists in Kenya
PLoS ONE, Volume 7, No. 8, Article e43342, Year 2012
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Background: Pastoralists in low-income countries usually live in close proximity to their animals and thus represent an important repository of information about livestock disease. Since wild and domestic animals often mix freely whilst grazing, pastoralists are also able to observe first-hand the diseases that are present in wildlife and as such are key informants in disease outbreaks in sylvatic animals. We report here the findings of the first study of the knowledge and role of Masai pastoralists in mange in wildlife and livestock in Masai Mara, Kenya. Methodology/Principal Findings: In this paper we describe the knowledge of mange accrued by 56 Masai pastoralists in Kenya and how they respond to it in both wildlife and livestock. In total, 52 (93%) pastoralists had a clear idea of the clinical appearance of mange, 13 (23%) understood its aetiology and 37 (66%) knew that mites were the causal agent. Thirty-nine (69%) believed that mange cross-infection between domestic and wild animals occurs, while 48 (85%) had observed mange in domestic animals including sheep (77%), goats (57%), dogs (24%) and cattle (14%). The pastoralists had also observed wild animals infected with mange, above all lions (19%), gazelles (14%), cheetahs (12%) and wildebeests (2%). In 68% of cases Masai pastoralists treat mange infection or apply control measures, most commonly via the topical use of acaricides (29%) and/or the reporting of the outbreak to the veterinary authorities (21%). In the period 2007-2011, Kenya Wildlife Service received 24 warnings of 59 wild animals with mange-like lesions from the Masai Mara pastoralist community. The reported species were cheetah, lion, wild dog, Thomson's gazelle and wildebeest. Conclusion: Masai pastoralists have good knowledge of mange epidemiology and treatment. Their observations and the treatments they apply are valuable in the control of this disease in both wild and domestic animals. © 2012 Gakuya et al.
Available Materials
https://efashare.b-cdn.net/share/pmc/articles/PMC3422303/bin/pone.0043342.s001.pdf
Authors & Co-Authors
Gakuya, Francis M.
Kenya, Nairobi
Kenya Wildlife Service
Ombui, Jackson Nyarongi
Kenya, Nairobi
University of Nairobi
Heukelbach, Jorg
Brazil, Fortaleza
Universidade Federal do Ceará
Maingi, Ndichu
Kenya, Nairobi
University of Nairobi
Muchemi, Gerald Mwangi
Kenya, Nairobi
University of Nairobi
Ogara, William Okelo
Kenya, Nairobi
University of Nairobi
Mijele, Dominic
Kenya, Nairobi
Kenya Wildlife Service
Alasaad, Samer
Spain, Sevilla
Csic - Estación Biologica de Doñana
Switzerland, Zurich
Universität Zürich
Statistics
Citations: 22
Authors: 8
Affiliations: 5
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0043342
e-ISSN:
19326203
Study Locations
Kenya