Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
A prospective randomised comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents with everolimus-eluting stents in acute coronary syndrome: The BASE-ACS trial
EuroIntervention, Volume 8, No. 3, Year 2012
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Aims: Titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents (BAS) have demonstrated a favourable outcome when compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). In a prospective randomised non-inferiority study design, we compared the safety and efficacy of BAS versus everolimuseluting stents (EES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods and results: We randomised 827 patients with ACS (1:1) to either BAS (417) or EES (410). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. At 12-month followup, the primary composite endpoint occurred in 9.6% of patients in the BAS group and 9.0% of those in the EES group (HR [hazard ratio] 1.04, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.81-1.32, p=0.81, p for non-inferiority = 0.001). Non-fatal MI was significantly less frequent in the BAS as compared with the EES group (2.2% vs. 5.9%, p=0.007). However, the individual rates of cardiac death and ischaemia-driven TLR were similar between the two groups (1.9% vs. 1.0%, p=0.39, and 6.5% vs. 4.9%, p=0.37, respectively). Conclusions: In patients presenting with ACS, BAS achieved a clinical outcome that was non-inferior to EES at 12-month follow-up. © Europa Edition 2012. All rights reserved.
Authors & Co-Authors
Karjalainen, Pasi Paavo
Finland, Pori
Satakunta Central Hospital
Niemelä, Matti J.
Finland, Oulu
Oulun Yliopisto
Airaksinen, Juhani K.E.
Finland, Turku
Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
Nammas, Wail M.
Finland, Pori
Satakunta Central Hospital
Ylitalo, Antti S.
Finland, Pori
Satakunta Central Hospital
Statistics
Citations: 53
Authors: 5
Affiliations: 9
Identifiers
Doi:
10.4244/EIJV8I3A49
ISSN:
19696213
Research Areas
Environmental
Noncommunicable Diseases
Study Design
Cohort Study