Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
medicine
Femoroacetabular impingement: Can the alpha angle be estimated?
American Journal of Roentgenology, Volume 190, No. 5, Year 2008
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
OBJECTIVE. Femoroacetabular impingement is an important entity with well-described radiographic findings. One of the criteria of the cam type of femoroacetabular impingement is femoral head-neck dysplasia, denoted mathematically as the "alpha angle." Several observers have reported that direct measurement of the angle may not be necessary because subjective appraisal may yield similar results. We sought to scientifically determine the accuracy of a subjective assessment, using the calculated angle as the gold standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS. At 1.5 T, 50 consecutive patients' hips were evaluated on sets of oblique axial images. Two musculoskeletal radiologists recorded their subjective opinion as to the alpha angle using a confidence scale of 1-5. Direct mathematic measurement of the alpha angle was done by a third independent observer and correlated with the subjective results. Correlations between the subjective and measured angles and interobserver variation were calculated. RESULTS. Statistically, significant variability was seen in the subjective assessment of the alpha angle. When the alpha angle was ≥ 55°, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.606, indicating that visual assessment is a poor predictor of a wide alpha angle. Even in patients with a measured normal alpha angle (< 55°), slightly fewer than half were subjectively thought to possibly, likely, or definitely have abnormal angles. Similarly, more than half of the abnormal cases (alpha angles ≥ 55°) were subjectively thought to possibly or probably be normal. CONCLUSION. Subjective assessment of alpha angles is suboptimal unless one is quite confident of a bone abnormality. © American Roentgen Ray Society.
Authors & Co-Authors
Nouh, Mohamed R.
United States, New York
Nyu Langone Orthopedic Hospital
Egypt, Alexandria
Faculty of Medicine
Schweitzer, Mark E.
United States, New York
Nyu Langone Orthopedic Hospital
Rybak, Leon
United States, New York
Nyu Langone Orthopedic Hospital
Cohen, Jodi
United States, New York
Nyu Langone Orthopedic Hospital
Statistics
Citations: 70
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 2
Identifiers
Doi:
10.2214/AJR.07.3258
ISSN:
0361803X