Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
medicine
Public priorities and preferences for end-of-life care in Namibia
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Volume 47, No. 3, Year 2014
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Context. Although quality end-of-life care provision is an international public health issue, the majority of evidence is not generated in low- and middle-income countries that bear a disproportionate burden of progressive illnesses. Objectives. To identify the priorities and preferences of the Namibian public for end-of-life care. Methods. Using a cross-sectional study design, data were collected in the country's capital, Windhoek, from November to December 2010. Results. In total, 200 respondents were recruited. The mean age was 27 years (SD 7.5; range 18-69), with nearly all (n = 199; 99.5%) expressing a religious affiliation. Being in pain was reported as the most concerning of nine common end-of-life symptoms and problems (n = 52; 26.1%), and the most important care-related aspect was having as much information as wanted (n = 144; 72%). The majority (64%) would want their end-of-life care to focus on improving their quality of life rather than extending it, with 40% not wanting to know if they had limited time left to live. Hospital (n = 96; 48%) and home (n = 64; 32%) were the most preferred places of death. The most important end-of-life priority was keeping a positive attitude (n = 128; 64%). Having had a close relative or friend diagnosed with a serious illness was associated with a 2.3 increase in the odds of preference for a hospital death (odds ratio = 2.34, P = 0.009, 95% CI 1.23-4.47). Conclusion. This study identified a number of areas that need to be pursued in future research to explore factors that may affect patient preferences and priorities in end-of-life care in Namibia. © 2014 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors & Co-Authors
Powell, Richard Antony
United States, New York
Healthcare Chaplaincy
Uganda, Kampala
African Palliative Care Association
Namisango, Eve
Uganda, Kampala
African Palliative Care Association
Gikaara, Nancy
Uganda, Kampala
African Palliative Care Association
Moyo, Sherperd
Uganda, Kampala
African Palliative Care Association
Mwangi-Powell, Faith N.
Uganda, Kampala
African Palliative Care Association
United States, New York
Open Society Foundations
Gomes, Barbara
United Kingdom, London
King's College London
Harding, Richard
United Kingdom, London
King's College London
Statistics
Citations: 31
Authors: 7
Affiliations: 4
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.04.004
ISSN:
08853924
e-ISSN:
18736513
Research Areas
Cancer
Disability
Health System And Policy
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Case-Control Study
Study Approach
Quantitative
Study Locations
Namibia