Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
medicine
Rilonacept for gout flare prevention during initiation of uric acid-lowering therapy: Results from the PRESURGE-2 international, phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Rheumatology (United Kingdom), Volume 52, No. 7, Year 2013
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitor rilonacept (IL-1 Trap) for gout flare (GF) prevention during initiation of uric acid-lowering therapy (ULT) with allopurinol in a multiregional phase 3 clinical trial. Methods: Hyperuricaemic adults (n = 248) from South Africa, Germany and Asia with gout and two or more GFs within the past year were initiated on allopurinol and randomized 1:1:1 to once-weekly s.c. treatment with placebo (PBO), rilonacept 80mg (R80) or rilonacept 160mg (R160) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the number of GFs per patient through week 16. Results: The population was predominantly male and racially diverse (white, 53.2%; Asian, 33.1%; black, 13.7%). Across treatments, most patients completed the study (87.892.9%). At 16 weeks the mean number of GFs per patient was reduced by 71.3% with R80 (0.35) and by 72.6% with R160 (0.34) relative to PBO (1.23; both P<0.0001). The proportion of patients without GFs was higher with R80 (74.4%) and R160 (79.5%) than with PBO (43.9%; both P40.0001), and the proportions of patients on rilonacept with multiple GFs were significantly lower (P<0.001). Overall, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar between PBO (61.0%) and rilonacept (65.1%). Injection site reactions, generally mild, were the most frequent AE with rilonacept (1.2% PBO, 12.2% R80 and 17.9% R160); none of these injection site reactions led to withdrawal. There were no study drug-related serious AEs or deaths. Conclusion. Rilonacept significantly reduced the occurrence of GFs associated with initiation of ULT, with >70% of patients having no flares, and demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.
Authors & Co-Authors
Mitha, Essack Aziz
South Africa, Johannesburg
Newtown Clinical Research
Ralph Schumacher, H.
United States, Philadelphia
University of Pennsylvania
Fouche, Leon Frederik
South Africa, Rustenburg, North-west
Limpopo Clinical Research Initiative
Luo, Shue Fen
Taiwan, Taipei
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Weinstein, Steven P.
United States, Tarrytown
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Yancopoulos, George D.
United States, Tarrytown
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wang, Jian
United States, Tarrytown
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
King-Davis, Shirletta
United States, Tarrytown
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Evans, Robert R.
United States, Tarrytown
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Statistics
Citations: 78
Authors: 9
Affiliations: 5
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1093/rheumatology/ket114
ISSN:
14620324
e-ISSN:
14620332
Research Areas
Health System And Policy
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Cohort Study
Study Locations
South Africa
Participants Gender
Male