Publication Details

AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS

SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH

Metabolic and body composition risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome in a cohort of women with a high prevalence of cardiometabolic disease

PLoS ONE, Volume 11, No. 9, Article e0162247, Year 2016

Background The aetiology of the metabolic syndrome and the inter-relationship between risk factors for this syndrome are poorly understood. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the risk factors for metabolic syndrome and their interactions in a cohort of women with a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Materials and Methods Abdominal and whole body composition (ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), blood pressure, and cardiometabolic and demographic factors were measured in a cross-sectional study of 702 black African women from Soweto, Johannesburg. Data was analysed using multivariate logistic regression. Results Metabolic syndrome was present in 49.6% of the study cohort. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that adiponectin (odds ratio [95% CIs]: 0.84 [0.77, 0.92], p<0.0005) and abdominal subcutaneous fat (0.56 [0.39,0.79], p = 0.001) reduced metabolic syndrome risk whilst insulin resistance (1.31 [1.16,1.48], p<0.0005) and trunk fat-free soft-tissue mass (1.34 [1.10,1.61], p = 0.002) increased risk. Within this group of risk factors, the relationship of adiponectin with metabolic syndrome risk, when analysed across adiponectin hexiles, was the least affected by adjustment for the other risk factors. Conclusions Adiponectin has a significant protective role against metabolic syndrome and is independent of other risk factors. The protective and possible augmentive effects of abdominal subcutaneous fat and lean trunk mass, respectively on metabolic syndrome risk demonstrate the existence of novel interactions between body composition and cardiometabolic disease.
Statistics
Citations: 23
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 1
Identifiers
Research Areas
Noncommunicable Diseases
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Cohort Study
Case-Control Study
Study Approach
Quantitative
Participants Gender
Female