Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
Quantifying the impoverishing effects of purchasing medicines: A cross-country comparison of the affordability of medicines in the developing world
PLoS Medicine, Volume 7, No. 8, Year 2010
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Background:Increasing attention is being paid to the affordability of medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LICs and MICs) where medicines are often highly priced in relation to income levels. The impoverishing effect of medicine purchases can be estimated by determining pre- and postpayment incomes, which are then compared to a poverty line. Here we estimate the impoverishing effects of four medicines in 16 LICs and MICs using the impoverishment method as a metric of affordability. Methods and Findings: Affordability was assessed in terms of the proportion of the population being pushed below US$1.25 or US$2 per day poverty levels because of the purchase of medicines. The prices of salbutamol 100 mcg/dose inhaler, glibenclamide 5 mg cap/tab, atenolol 50 mg cap/tab, and amoxicillin 250 mg cap/tab were obtained from facility-based surveys undertaken using a standard measurement methodology. The World Bank's World Development Indicators provided household expenditure data and information on income distributions. In the countries studied, purchasing these medicines would impoverish large portions of the population (up to 86%). Originator brand products were less affordable than the lowest-priced generic equivalents. In the Philippines, for example, originator brand atenolol would push an additional 22% of the population below US$1.25 per day, whereas for the lowest priced generic equivalent this demographic shift is 7%. Given related prevalence figures, substantial numbers of people are affected by the unaffordability of medicines. Conclusions: Comparing medicine prices to available income in LICs and MICs shows that medicine purchases by individuals in those countries could lead to the impoverishment of large numbers of people. Action is needed to improve medicine affordability, such as promoting the use of quality assured, low-priced generics, and establishing health insurance systems. ©2010 Niëns et al.
Available Materials
https://efashare.b-cdn.net/share/pmc/articles/PMC2930876/bin/pmed.1000333.s001.doc
https://efashare.b-cdn.net/share/pmc/articles/PMC2930876/bin/pmed.1000333.s002.doc
https://efashare.b-cdn.net/share/pmc/articles/PMC2930876/bin/pmed.1000333.s003.doc
Authors & Co-Authors
Niëns, Laurens M.
Unknown Affiliation
Cameron, Alexandra
Switzerland, Geneva
Organisation Mondiale de la Santé
Van De Poel, Ellen
Unknown Affiliation
Ewen, Margaret A.
Netherlands, Amsterdam
Health Action International
Laing, Richard Ogilvie
Switzerland, Geneva
Organisation Mondiale de la Santé
Statistics
Citations: 111
Authors: 5
Affiliations: 2
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000333
ISSN:
15491676
Research Areas
Health System And Policy
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study