Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
medicine
Creatinine Clearance Estimation After Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of Three Methods
Transplantation Proceedings, Volume 39, No. 8, Year 2007
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Surveillance of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the management of kidney transplant recipients. We compared the performance of estimation equations with 99mTechnetium (99mTc)-DTPA clearance (TcGFR) in 32 of our patients, using the Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD), Nankivell (NK), and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formulas. All patients were adequately hydrated before study. 99mTc-DTPA was injected intravenously (maximal dose = 37 MBq). A second syringe was prepared for an aliquot of the study ("standard"). Blood was sampled at 120 and 240 minutes in various sites. After centrifugation, 1.0 mL plasma was transferred into a counting vial. Both the samples and the "standard" were measured in a well counter. The mean time from transplantation to TcGFR was 47.9 months (range, 4-143 months). The mean serum creatinine level was 124 μmol/L (range, 70-371 μmol/L). The mean TcGFR was 58.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range, 14-100 mL/min/1.73 m2). The MDRD equation showed a median difference of 1.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 with 81.2% of estimated GFR within 20% of TcGFR. Median differences were 8.94 and 11.47 mL/min/1.73 m2 for NK and CG formulas, respectively. The precision of the NK and CG was such that only 56.25% and 62.5% of estimations, respectively, fell within 20% of TcGFR. In this study, the MDRD equation demonstrated the best overall performance among the 3 tested methods. It should be sufficient for routine clinical practice in kidney transplantation. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors & Co-Authors
Harzallah, Kais
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Sellem, A.
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
M'Hiri Chaabouni, A.
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Slim, Ihsen
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Halouas, M.
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Mezzigue, C.
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Belhadj, Raoudha
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Hmida, Jalel
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Hammami, Hatem
Unknown Affiliation
Manaa, Jamele
Tunisia, Tunis
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Militaire de Tunis
Statistics
Citations: 11
Authors: 10
Affiliations: 1
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.08.011
ISSN:
00411345