Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
medicine
Diagnosis and evaluation of neuropathic pain in general practice: Expert panel recommendations for the French-speaking North-African countries
Douleurs, Volume 12, No. 1, Year 2011
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Over the past decade, several recommendations on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of neuropathic pain (NeP) have been published. These guidelines are evidence-based and have been developed by expert panels of major scientific associations, most of whom being American or European. Although these recommendations can be applied to most patients, a gap does exist because they do not take into account the specific health status and socio-cultural and professional practice conditions in the different regions of the world. To date there are no published guidelines for NeP in the French-speaking North-African countries (Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco). Based on the rationale that the diagnosis and evaluation of NeP are crucial to propose an adapted treatment, a multidisciplinary panel of French-speaking North-African experts met to review critically the available data and to reach a consensus on how best applying evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of NeP in their countries. The expert panel recommends to increase diagnosis awareness of NeP by using validated screening questionnaires, in particular the DN4 questionnaire, and to evaluate patients by systematic examination with the help of simple and accessible tools. These recommendations will help the practitioners to identify the qualitative features of NeP and to make a differential diagnosis between NeP and nociceptive pain clinically and without additional tests. © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS.
Authors & Co-Authors
Haddad, Monia
Tunisia, Tunis
Hôpital la Rabta
Bouajina, Elyès
Tunisia, Sousse
Hopital Farhat Hached Sousse
Gouider, R.
Tunisia, Manouba
Université de Tunis el Manar, Hôpital Razi
Griene, Brahim
Algeria, Algiers
Établissement Hospitalier Spécialisé Neurochirurgie
Ladjouze, A.
Algeria, Algiers
Etablissement Hospitalier Spécialisé de Ben Aknoun
Marouan, Fatima
Macao, Casablanca
Endocrinologue
Nejmi, Mati M.
Macao, Rabat
Institut National D'oncologie
Ouazzani Taibi, M. R.
Macao, Rabat
Hôpital Des Spécialités de Rabat
Zekri, Samia
Algeria, Algiers
Hopital Birtraria
Statistics
Citations: 9
Authors: 9
Affiliations: 9
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/j.douler.2010.11.010
ISSN:
16245687
Study Approach
Qualitative
Study Locations
Algeria
Morocco
Tunisia