Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
agricultural and biological sciences
Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine
PLoS Biology, Volume 21, No. 1, Article e3001949, Year 2023
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
The state of open science needs to be monitored to track changes over time and identify areas to create interventions to drive improvements. In order to monitor open science practices, they first need to be well defined and operationalized. To reach consensus on what open science practices to monitor at biomedical research institutions, we conducted a modified 3-round Delphi study. Participants were research administrators, researchers, specialists in dedicated open science roles, and librarians. In rounds 1 and 2, participants completed an online survey evaluating a set of potential open science practices, and for round 3, we hosted two half-day virtual meetings to discuss and vote on items that had not reached consensus. Ultimately, participants reached consensus on 19 open science practices. This core set of open science practices will form the foundation for institutional dashboards and may also be of value for the development of policy, education, and interventions. Copyright: © 2023 Cobey et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Available Materials
https://efashare.b-cdn.net/share/pmc/articles/PMC9873153/bin/pbio.3001949.s001.docx
Authors & Co-Authors
Haustein, Stefanie
Canada, Ottawa
University of Ottawa
Hemkens, Lars G.
Germany, Berlin
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Switzerland, Basel
Universitat Basel
United States, Palo Alto
Stanford University
Costas, Rodrigo
Netherlands, Leiden
Universiteit Leiden
Sena, Emily Shamiso
United Kingdom, Edinburgh
The University of Edinburgh
van Leeuwen, Thed
Netherlands, Leiden
Universiteit Leiden
Ardern, Clare L.
Australia, Melbourne
La Trobe University
Canada, Vancouver
The University of British Columbia
Bacellar, Isabel O.L.
Canada, Montreal
Le Centre de Recherche Douglas
Correa, M. B.
Brazil, Pelotas
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Fergusson, Dean A.
Canada, Ottawa
University of Ottawa
Canada, Ottawa
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Hoffman, Michael M.
Canada, Toronto
University Health Network University of Toronto
Canada, Toronto
University of Toronto
Bielemann, Renata Moraes
Brazil, Pelotas
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Rac, Valeria E.
Canada, Toronto
University Health Network University of Toronto
Canada, Toronto
University of Toronto
Canada, Toronto
Diabetes Action Canada
Schätzl, Hermann M.
Canada, Calgary
University of Calgary
Moher, David
Canada, Ottawa
University of Ottawa
Canada, Ottawa
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Statistics
Citations: 4
Authors: 14
Affiliations: 23
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1371/journal.pbio.3001949
ISSN:
15449173
Research Areas
Health System And Policy
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative