Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
medicine
Effect of budesonide in combination with formoterol for reliever therapy in asthma exacerbations: a randomised controlled, double-blind study
Lancet, Volume 368, No. 9537, Year 2006
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Background: The contributions of as-needed inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA) to asthma control have not been fully established. We compared the efficacy and safety of three reliever strategies: a traditional short-acting β2 agonist; a rapid-onset LABA (formoterol); and a combination of LABA and an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide-formoterol) in symptomatic patients receiving budesonide-formoterol maintenance therapy. Methods: We did a 12-month, double-blind, parallel-group study in 3394 patients (aged 12 years or older), in 289 centres in 20 countries, who were using inhaled corticosteroids at study entry and symptomatic on budesonide-formoterol (160 μg and 4·5 μg, respectively), one inhalation twice daily, during a 2-week run-in. After run-in, patients were randomly assigned budesonide-formoterol maintenance therapy plus one of three alternative as-needed medications-terbutaline (0·4 mg), formoterol (4·5 μg), or budesonide-formoterol (160 μg and 4·5 μg). The primary outcome was time to first severe exacerbation, defined as an event resulting in hospitalisation, emergency room treatment, or both, or the need for oral steroids for 3 days or more. Findings: Time to first severe exacerbation was longer with as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus formoterol (p=0·0048; log-rank test) and with as-needed formoterol versus terbutaline (p=0·0051). The rate of severe exacerbations was 37, 29, and 19 per 100 patients per year with as-needed terbutaline, formoterol, and budesonide-formoterol, respectively (rate ratios budesonide-formoterol versus formoterol 0·67 [95% CI 0·56-0·80; p<0·0001]; budesonide-formoterol versus terbutaline 0·52 [0·44-0·62; p<0·0001]; formoterol versus terbutaline 0·78 [0·67-0·91; p=0·0012]). Asthma control days increased to a similar extent in all treatment groups. As-needed formoterol did not significantly improve symptoms compared with as-needed terbutaline. All treatments were well tolerated. Interpretation: Both monocomponents of budesonide-formoterol given as needed contribute to enhanced protection from severe exacerbations in patients receiving combination therapy for maintenance. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors & Co-Authors
Rabe, Klaus F.
Netherlands, Leiden
Universiteit Leiden
Atienza, Tito
Philippines, Quezon City
Veterans Memorial Medical Center
Magyar, Pál
Hungary, Budapest
Semmelweis Egyetem
Larsson, Per
Sweden, Sodertalje
Astrazeneca Sweden
Jorup, Carin
Sweden, Sodertalje
Astrazeneca Sweden
Lalloo, Umesh Gangaram
South Africa, Durban
The Nelson R. Mandela Medical School
Statistics
Citations: 400
Authors: 6
Affiliations: 5
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69284-2
ISSN:
01406736
Research Areas
Disability
Health System And Policy
Study Design
Randomised Control Trial