Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
The effects on tuberculosis treatment adherence from utilising community health workers: A comparison of selected rural and urban settings in Kenya
PLoS ONE, Volume 9, No. 2, Article e88937, Year 2014
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Introduction: Community Health Workers (CHWs) have been utilised for various primary health care activities in different settings especially in developing countries. Usually when utilised in well defined terms, they have a positive impact. To support Kenya's policy on engagement of CHWs for tuberculosis (TB) control, there is need to demonstrate effects of utilising them. Objectives: This study assessed TB treatment adherence among patients who utilised CHWs in management of their illness in comparison to those who did not in urban and rural settings. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in selected health facilities using standard clinical records for each TB patient registered for treatment between 2005 to 2011. Qualitative data was collected from CHWs and health care providers. Results: The study assessed 2778 tuberculosis patients and among them 1499 (54%) utilized CHWs for their TB treatment. The urban setting in comparison with the rural setting contributed 70% of patients utilising the CHWs (p<0.001). Overall treatment adherence of the cohort was 79%. Categorizing by use of CHWs, adherence among patients who had utilized CHWs was 83% versus 68% among those that had not (p<0.001). In comparison between the rural and urban settings adherence was 76% and 81.5% (p<0.001) respectively and when categorized by use of CHWs it was 73% and 90% (p<0.001) for the rural and urban set ups respectively. Utilisation of CHWs remained significant in enhancing treatment adherence in the cohort with unadjusted and adjusted ORs; OR 2.25, (95% 1.86-2.73) p<0.001 and OR 1.98 (95% 1.51-2.5) p<0.001 respectively. It was most effective in the urban set-up, OR 2.65 (95% 2.02-3.48, p<0.001) in comparison to the rural set up, OR 0.74 (95% 0.56-0.97) p = 0.032. Conclusion: Utilisation of CHWs enhanced TB treatment adherence and the best effects were in the urban set-up. © 2014 Ong'ang'o et al.
Authors & Co-Authors
Ong'ang'o, Jane Rahedi
Kenya, Nairobi
Kenya Medical Research Institute
Mwachari, Christina W.
Kenya, Nairobi
Kenya Medical Research Institute
Kipruto, Hillary Kipchumba
Kenya, Nairobi
Kenya Country Office
Karanja, Simon
Kenya, Nairobi
Jomo Kenya University of Agriculture and Technology
Statistics
Citations: 37
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 3
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0088937
e-ISSN:
19326203
Research Areas
Health System And Policy
Infectious Diseases
Study Design
Cohort Study
Study Approach
Qualitative
Quantitative
Study Locations
Kenya