Publication Details

AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS

SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH

medicine

Prevalence and distribution of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serogroups and serovars isolated from normally sterile sites: a global systematic review

Epidemiology and Infection, Year 2023

To inform coverage by potential vaccines, we aimed to systematically review evidence on the prevalence and distribution of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serogroups and serovars. We searched four databases from inception through 4th June 2021. Articles were included that reported at least one non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica strain by serogroup or serovar isolated from a normally sterile site. Of serogrouped isolates, we pooled the prevalence of serogroup O:4, serogroup O:9, and other serogroups using random-effects meta-analyses. Of serotyped isolates, we pooled the prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium (member of serogroup O:4), Salmonella Enteritidis (member of serogroup O:9), and other serovars. Of 82 studies yielding 24,253 serogrouped isolates, the pooled prevalence (95% CI) was 44.6% (36.2%-48.2%) for serogroup O:4, 45.5% (37.0%-49.1%) for serogroup O:9, and 9.9% (6.1%-13.3%) for other serogroups. Likewise, the pooled prevalence (95%CI) was 36.8% (29.9%-44.0%) for Salmonella Typhimurium, 37.8% (33.2%-42.4%) for Salmonella Enteritidis, and 18.4% (11.4%-22.9%) for other serovars. Of global serogrouped non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates from normally sterile sites, serogroup O:4 and O:9 together accounted for 90%, and among serotyped isolates, serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis together accounted for 75%. Vaccine development strategies covering serogroups O:4 and O:9, or serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis, have the potential to prevent the majority of non-typhoidal Salmonella invasive disease. © 2023 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Statistics
Citations: 1
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 2
Identifiers
Research Areas
Health System And Policy
Infectious Diseases
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systematic review