The use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for tropical theileriosis research in Morocco

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using sonicated purified Theileria annulata piroplasms was compared with an indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) during a vaccination trial in cattle to test different doses and passage numbers of an attenuated T. annulata-infected lymphoblastoid cell-line, and also with Giemsa-stained blood smears during an epidemiological field study of tropical theileriosis in Morocco. The sensitivities of both the ELISA (0.56) and the IFAT using T. annulata piroplasm antigen (0.56) were lower than the IFAT using schizont antigen (0.94) for detecting serum antibodies from 18 cattle immunised 38 days previously with cell-line. The ELISA was, however, the most sensitive test after 180 days (0.50 compared with 0.06 for the piroplasm IFAT and 0.39 for the schizont IFAT), and each test detected antibodies in all sera after challenge with live T. annulata sporozoites. There were minor differences in the ability of blood smear examinations and the ELISA to detect infected and uninfected cattle in the field study at the start and end of the disease season. Initially, the sensitivity and specificity of blood smears were both 0.96 and for the ELISA were 0.83 and 0.86, whereas at the end of the season sensitivity and specificity of blood smears were 0.96 and 0.86 and for the ELISA were 0.95 and 0.94. The specificity of the ELISA was affected by the presence of calves with colostral antibodies, and if these were disregarded the specificities before and after the season were 0.94 and 1.00.