Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
medicine
Autonomic impairment in rheumatoid arthritis
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, Volume 15, No. 4, Year 2012
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Aim: To determine if there is a difference between autonomic cardiac control as measured by heart rate variability (HRV) in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to a healthy control group. Methods: The RA group (45) and control group (39) were matched for age and body mass index (BMI). Three techniques were used: time domain, frequency domain and Poincarè plot analysis. All possible confounding factors were excluded and the test environment strictly regulated. Results: Basal heart rate was significantly higher in the RA patients. In the supine position significant differences existed between RA patients and controls (P ≤ 0.01). Indicators of parasympathetic activity showed significantly lower variation in the RA group (root mean square of the standard deviation [RMSSD] = 14.70, percentage of successive normal-to-normal interval differences larger than 50 ms [pNN50] = 0.50, standard deviation [SD]1 = 10.50, high frequency [HF] (ms2) = 31) compared to controls (RMSSD = 29.40, pNN50 = 7.8, SD1 = 20.9, HF (ms2) = 141.00). Indicators of sympathetic variation were also significantly lower in RA patients (SD2 = 36.70, low frequency [LF] (ms2) = 65) compared to controls (SD2 = 49.50, LF (ms2) = 175). In the standing position eight variables indicated autonomic impairment by significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) between the groups. The response of the RA group to an orthostatic stressor showed less vagal withdrawal, (P-values for RMSSD = 0.038, pNN50 = 0.022, SD1 = 0.043 and HF [ms2] = 0.008 respectively); and lower sympathetic response (P-values for SD2 = 0.001 and LF [ms2] < 0.001) when compared to controls. Conclusions: An inability of the autonomic nervous system to efficiently compensate for internal and external environmental changes may predispose RA patients to arrhythmias, thereby increasing cardiovascular mortality. All three methods used showed the same outcome, implying decreased HRV and thus an increased risk for arrhythmias in RA patients. Evaluating the autonomic nervous system might be critical in planning management of RA patients. © 2012 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
Authors & Co-Authors
Janse van Rensburg, Dina Christina
South Africa, Pretoria
University of Pretoria
Ker, James A.
South Africa, Pretoria
University of Pretoria
Grant, Catharina Cornelia
South Africa, Pretoria
University of Pretoria
Fletcher, Lizelle
South Africa, Pretoria
University of Pretoria
Statistics
Citations: 33
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 1
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1111/j.1756-185X.2012.01730.x
ISSN:
17561841
e-ISSN:
1756185X
Research Areas
Noncommunicable Diseases
Study Design
Randomised Control Trial
Participants Gender
Female