Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
earth and planetary sciences
Source mechanism of mining induced seismic events - Resolution of double couple and non double couple models
Tectonophysics, Volume 456, No. 1-2, Year 2008
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Traditional assumption about a seismic source as a double couple (DC) can represent a serious limitation for describing mechanisms of mining induced seismic events. In mining conditions more general process than a shear slip can occur due to stress concentration on mined-out areas. We assume both non-DC components within the dipole description of the source - the moment tensor, and a single force. We processed five seismic events recorded at Driefontein gold mine in South Africa to demonstrate that waveform modeling is not successful enough due to poor information about the medium. Inversion of amplitudes of direct P- and S-waves is more prospective due to their smaller sensitivity to detail of the medium and possibility to correct them for ray bending and shear wave splitting prior to the inversion. Moreover, we are able to estimate the error of the resulting mechanism due to neglect of ray bending. All five events processed display non-DC mechanisms which are significant at 95% considering the mismodelling of the rock mass by a homogeneous isotropic medium. The source mechanisms are in agreement with the underground mining and geological structures. One event has a sub-vertical pressure single dipole complemented by an implosion, which is the body force equivalent of a collapsing horizontal crack or a burst of a pillar supporting the hangingwall of a mined-out area. Two events have mechanisms close to a pressure single couple. All three events are located on pillars. Two out of these three events can be assigned with a downward single force as an alternative mechanism, which matches the amplitude data successfully. It is the force equivalent of a mined-out area collapse, when a rock mass falls from the hangingwall to the footwall. The events are however rather strong, which would require too large rock mass fallen. One of the remaining events is a nearly horizontal tensile single couple, corresponding to a vertical tensional fault. It could be originated by a break of the hangingwall of a mined-out area, however the hypocenter of this event is deep into the footwall were there is no mining taking place. The last event is mostly DC accompanied by a compensated compressive dipole, which may be associated to nearly vertical dip-slip along a fault in the hangingwall. This event is located on the margin of a wide pillar which supports the interpretation. © 2008.
Authors & Co-Authors
Šílený, Jan
Czech Republic, Prague
Geophysical Institute, Prague
Milev, Alexander M.
South Africa, Johannesburg
Csir Natural Resources and the Environment
Statistics
Citations: 96
Authors: 2
Affiliations: 2
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/j.tecto.2006.09.021
ISSN:
00401951
Research Areas
Environmental
Violence And Injury
Study Design
Cohort Study
Study Locations
South Africa