Valve replacement in rheumatic mitral incompetence: Total versus posterior chordal preservation
Cardiovascular Surgery, Volume 6, No. 2, Year 1998
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Several studies have shown that mitral valve replacement with total chordal preservation (MVR-TCP) improves left ventricular function when compared with total chordal transection. Few clinical studies, however, have compared this technique to that involving only posterior chordal preservation (MVR-PCP). This study was intended to cover this aspect. A total of 36 consecutive patients with chronic rheumatic mitral incompetence were operated upon by one surgeon and benefited from MVR-TCP (group I). During the same period and along similar selection criteria, 60 patients underwent MVR-PCP (group II) in our department. With the exception of a statistically significant higher preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) percentage and lower fractional shortening (LVFS) percentage in group II patients; both groups were comparable as regarding age, sex distribution New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (FC), preoperative left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) as well as aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. The means of the differences, between the pre- and postoperative values of NYHA FC and echocardiographic data were compared between both groups. As compared with group II, group I patients showed lower: hospital mortality rate (0 versus 8.3%; P > 0.05); need for positive inotropic support (11.1 versus 20.8%; P > 0.05) and total ICU stay (2.9 ± 0.17 versus 2.2 ± 0.13 days; P < 0.01). In addition, group I patients showed a better NYHA FC improvement (-2.08 ± 0.15 versus -1.93 ± 0.11; P > 0.05) as well as a statistically significant (P < 0.00001) higher decrease in the LAD (-18.19 ± 0.97 versus -11.59 ± 0.58 mm), LVEDD (-14.44 ± 0.91 versus - 6.17 ± 0.05 mm), LVESD (-6.17 ± 0.77 versus -3.23 ± 0.01 mm), LVFS percentage (-0.06 ± 0.01 versus -0.01 ± 0.001%) and a higher increase in the LVEF percentage (8.1 ± 0.9 versus 1.48 ± 0.02%). The smaller mean diameter of the implanted St Jude prosthesis, in group I patients (26.77 ± 0.22 versus 27.43 ± 0.21 mm; P = 0.046), was neither associated with the use of a smaller prosthesis than that predicted for the patient size nor a significantly higher mean transprosthetic pressure gradient. These data suggest that in rheumatic patients with chronic mitral incompetence, MVR-TCP is always feasible: it is associated with lower hospital mortality and morbidity rates and better preservation of the postoperative left ventricular systolic functions when compared with MVR-PCP.