Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
earth and planetary sciences
Evolution of the u-band luminosity function from redshift 1.2 to 0
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 397, No. 1, Year 2009
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
We produce and analyse u-band (λ ≈ 355 nm) luminosity functions (LFs) for the red and blue populations of galaxies using data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) u-band Galaxy Survey (uGS) and Deep Evolutionary Exploratory Probe 2 (DEEP2) survey. From a spectroscopic sample of 41 575 SDSS uGS galaxies and 24 561 DEEP2 galaxies, we produce colour magnitude diagrams and make use of the colour bimodality of galaxies to separate red and blue populations. LFs for eight redshift slices in the range 0.01 < z < 1.2 are determined using the 1/Vmax method and fitted with Schechter functions showing that there is significant evolution in M*, with a brightening of 1.4 mag for the combined population. The integration of the Schechter functions yields the evolution in the u-band luminosity density (LD) out to z ∼ 1. By parametrizing the evolution as ρ ∝ (1 + z) β, we find that β = 1.36 ± 0.2 for the combined populations and β = 2.09 ± 0.2 for the blue population. By removing the contribution of the old stellar population to the u-band LD and correcting for dust attenuation, we estimate the evolution in the star formation rate (SFR) of the Universe to be βSFR = 2.5 ± 0.3. Discrepancies between our result and higher evolution rates measured using the infrared and far-UV can be reconciled by considering possibilities such as an underestimated dust correction at high redshifts or evolution in the stellar initial mass function. © 2009 RAS.
Authors & Co-Authors
Prescott, Matthew
United Kingdom, Liverpool
Liverpool John Moores University
Baldry, Ivan K.
United Kingdom, Liverpool
Liverpool John Moores University
James, Philip A.
United Kingdom, Liverpool
Liverpool John Moores University
Statistics
Citations: 25
Authors: 3
Affiliations: 1
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14859.x
ISSN:
00358711
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Exploratory Study
Study Approach
Quantitative