Publication Details

AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS

SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH

medicine

Normal limits of electrocardiogram in Africans and their consequences on the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive individuals: Insights from the TAHES study

Journal of Electrocardiology, Volume 76, Year 2023

Aims: To determine normal limits for major ECG variables, and the electrocardiographic impact of hypertension, in a rural sub-Saharan African setting. Methods: This cross-sectional study included adults aged ≥25 years from Tanvè Health Study (TAHES) cohort. ECG were recorded at rest at 25 mm/s using a standard 12‑lead device. Wave amplitudes and durations were measured. Corrected QT interval (QTc) was calculated using Bazett's formula. Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell and Peguero-Lo Presti criteria were determined to assess left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Results: ECG was recorded among 997 out of 1407 TAHES participants. After exclusion of subjects with hypertension or diabetes, normal limits, defined as the 2nd and 98th percentiles, were evaluated in 622 healthy participants (median: 37 years; 60.1% women). The following limits were established in men (women): heart rate: 50 to 100 (55 to 102) beats/min, P wave duration: 80 to 120 (80 to 120) ms, PR interval: 120 to 200 (120 to 200) ms, QTc: 315 to 470 (323 to 465) ms, QRS duration: 50 to 120 (50 to 110) ms. Upper limits (in millimeter) for the Sokolow-Lyon, Cornell and Peguero-Lo Presti for men (women) were 47 (38), 30 (22) and 39 (30), respectively, all above current reference limits. The prevalence of LVH in hypertensive subjects according to these criteria were lower than those estimated according to current LVH criteria. Conclusion: The normal limits of ECG variables determined in this African population differ from those in Caucasians, indicating that ethnicity must be considered in ECG interpretation.
Statistics
Citations: 12
Authors: 12
Affiliations: 4
Research Areas
Noncommunicable Diseases
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Cohort Study
Study Approach
Quantitative
Participants Gender
Male
Female