Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
economics, econometrics and finance
Evaluating contingent and actual contributions to a local public good: Tsetse control in the Yale agro-pastoral zone, Burkina Faso
Ecological Economics, Volume 39, No. 1, Year 2001
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
In this case study of the Yale agro-pastoral zone in southern Burkina Faso, the sustainability of tsetse control as a local public good was shown to depend upon farmers' contributions to establish and maintain the traps and targets that attract and kill tsetse flies. Contingent valuation (CV) techniques were used to generate estimates of farmers' willingness to pay for tsetse control in money, labour, or both forms of payment. Of the 261 households that participated in the CV survey, these proportions were 23, 37 and 40%, respectively, indicating differentiation among the population and an overall preference for labour contribution. A comparison of predicted versus actual contribution of labour indicated that only 56% of households that said they would contribute actually contributed; 3% of households that said they would not contribute actually contributed. Major factors affecting contingent contributions of labour in discrete choice models were identified as well as those to account for in any successful scheme for actual labour contribution. These factors include the age of household head, offtake of cattle, involvement in secondary activities, membership in rural organizations, current expenditure on drug therapy, and cash-on-hand. The results also indicate that full cost-recovery of the investment in targets - about US$8000 - could not be achieved in the short run with the proposed contribution of US$0.90-1.00 per month per household. Contingent contributions of money were interpreted as maximum donations to expect of beneficiaries as part of the total cost of providing tsetse control. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors & Co-Authors
Kamuanga, Mulumba Jean Bosco
Kenya, Nairobi
International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi
Burkina Faso, Bobo-dioulasso
Centre International de Recherche-developpement Sur Lelevage en Zone Subhumide, Bobo-dioulasso
Swallow, Brent M.
Kenya, Nairobi
World Agroforestry Centre
Sigué, Hamadé
Burkina Faso, Bobo-dioulasso
Centre International de Recherche-developpement Sur Lelevage en Zone Subhumide, Bobo-dioulasso
Bauer, Burkhard
Kenya, Nairobi
Fitca-kenya
Statistics
Citations: 59
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 4
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00202-6
ISSN:
09218009
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Case Study
Study Approach
Qualitative
Quantitative
Study Locations
Burkina Faso