Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
dentistry
Resistance to fracture of roots obturated with novel canal-filling systems
Journal of Endodontics, Volume 37, No. 11, Year 2011
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Introduction: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of roots obturated with various contemporary canal-filling systems. Methods: Fifty single-rooted extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated to obtain 13-mm root segments. Ten roots were left unprepared and unfilled (negative control). Forty canals were instrumented using 0.06 taper EndoSequence files (Brassler, Savannah, GA). Roots were divided according to the obturating system into 4 groups (n = 10): group 1: iRoot SP sealer (Innovative Bioceramix, Vancouver, Canada) + ActiV GP cone (Brasseler USA, Savanah, GA), group 2: iRoot SP sealer + gutta-percha (GP), group 3: ActiV GP sealer + ActiV GP cone, and group 4: ActiV GP sealer + GP. All groups were obturated using single-cone technique. The roots within each group were embedded in acrylic molds and subjected to the fracture resistance test in which a compressive loading (0.5 mm/min) was applied until fracture. Data were statistically analyzed (analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test). Results: The significantly highest fracture resistance was recorded for both the negative control group (381.4 ± 53.2 N) and group 1 (iRoot SP sealer/ActiV GP cone [372 ± 62.9 N]) with no significant difference between them, whereas the significantly lowest value was reported in group 4 (ActiV GP sealer/GP cone [288.3 ± 30.5 N]). Conclusion: Bioceramic-based sealer (ie, iRoot SP) is a promising sealer in terms of increasing in vitro resistance to the fracture of endodontically treated roots particularly when accompanied with ActiV GP cones. Copyright © 2011 American Association of Endodontists.
Authors & Co-Authors
Ghoneim, Angie Galal
Egypt, Giza
Cairo University
Lutfy, Reem A.
Egypt, Giza
Cairo University
Sabet, Nihal E.
Egypt, Giza
Cairo University
Fayyad, Dalia Mukhtar
Egypt, Cairo
Misr International University
Statistics
Citations: 86
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 2
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.008
ISSN:
00992399
Study Design
Randomised Control Trial