Publication Details

AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS

SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH

medicine

Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy

Middle East Fertility Society Journal, Volume 20, No. 3, Article 332, Year 2015

Abstract Study objective To evaluate the effect of parity, menopausal status, menstrual cycle phase, cervical or uterine pathology and duration of procedure on pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Design Cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting University hospital. Patients Two hundred and fifty-four women. Intervention Office hysteroscopy without anesthesia. Methodology Pain intensity was assessed at the end of procedure using visual analog scale from zero (no pain) to ten (intolerable pain). Results Eighty-six patients (33.86%) reported no pain or mild discomfort (0-3 pain score), 118 patients (46.46%) reported moderate pain (4-7 pain score), 44 patients (17.32%) experienced severe pain (8-9 pain score) and 6 patients (2.36%) experienced intolerable pain (10 pain score) necessitating stoppage of the procedure. Bivariate analysis revealed that nulliparous patients had a higher risk of developing severe or intolerable pain compared with non-nulliparous patients (26.67% vs. 11.76%, P value = 0.003). Moreover, severe or intolerable pain was reported more frequently in patients with cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min (39.58% vs. 15.05%, P value = 0.0001 and 25.22% vs. 15.11%, P value = 0.044 respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min were strongly associated with severe or intolerable pain (8-10 pain score). Conclusion Nulliparity, cervical pathology and duration of procedure more than 2 min seem to be the main factors associated with severe or intolerable pain during office hysteroscopy.
Statistics
Citations: 27
Authors: 4
Affiliations: 1
Identifiers
Research Areas
Health System And Policy
Sexual And Reproductive Health
Study Design
Randomised Control Trial
Cohort Study
Study Approach
Quantitative
Participants Gender
Female