Background: The NINDS trial demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in improving the neurologic outcome in patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes. Patients who had a prior history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were excluded from this trial, possibly due to a hypothetical increase in the subsequent bleeding risk. Thus, there is little data available, whether against or in favor of, the use of IV rtPA in patients with prior ICH. We aim to aid in determining the safety of IV rtPA in such patients through a retrospective hospital-based single center study. Methods: We reviewed the brain imaging of all patients who received IV rtPA at our comprehensive stroke center from January 2006 to April 2014 for evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV rtPA administration. Their outcomes were determined in terms of subsequent development of symptomatic ICH as defined by the NINDS trial. Results: Brain imaging for 640 patients was reviewed. A total of 27 patients showed evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV thrombolysis, all intra-parenchymal. Only 1 patient (3.7%) developed subsequent symptomatic ICH after the administration of IV rtPA. Of the remaining 613 patients who received IV rtPA, 25 patients (4.1%) developed symptomatic ICH. Conclusion: This retrospective study provides Level C evidence that patients with imaging evidence of prior asymptomatic intra-parenchymal hemorrhage presenting with an acute ischemic stroke do not show an increased risk of developing symptomatic ICH after IV thrombolysis. of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
