Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test
European Journal of Personality, Volume 24, No. 4, Year 2010
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
A Dual Process Model (DPM) approach to prejudice proposes that there should be at least two dimensions of generalized prejudice relating to outgroup stratification and social perception, which should be differentially predicted by Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO). The current study assessed the causal effects of SDO and RWA on three dimensions of prejudice using a full cross-lagged longitudinal sample (N=127). As expected, RWA, but not SDO, predicted prejudice towards 'dangerous' groups, SDO, but not RWA, predicted prejudice towards 'derogated' groups, and both RWA and SDO predicted prejudice towards 'dissident' groups. Results support previously untested causal predictions derived from the DPM and indicate that different forms of prejudice result from different SDO-and RWA-based motivational processes. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors & Co-Authors
Asbrock, Frank
Germany, Marburg
Philipps-universität Marburg
Sibley, Chris G.
New Zealand, Auckland
The University of Auckland
Duckitt, John H.
New Zealand, Auckland
The University of Auckland
Statistics
Citations: 224
Authors: 3
Affiliations: 2
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1002/per.746
ISSN:
10990984
Study Design
Cohort Study