Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
Impact of male infanticide on the social structure of mountain gorillas
PLoS ONE, Volume 8, No. 11, Article e78256, Year 2013
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
Infanticide can be a major influence upon the social structure of species in which females maintain long-term associations with males. Previous studies have suggested that female mountain gorillas benefit from residing in multimale groups because infanticide occurs when one-male groups disintegrate after the dominant male dies. Here we measure the impact of infanticide on the reproductive success of female mountain gorillas, and we examine whether their dispersal patterns reflect a strategy to avoid infanticide. Using more than 40 years of data from up to 70% of the entire population, we found that only 1.7% of the infants that were born in the study had died from infanticide during group disintegrations. The rarity of such infanticide mainly reflects a low mortality rate of dominant males in one-male groups, and it does not dispel previous observations that infanticide occurs during group disintegrations. After including infanticide from causes other than group disintegrations, infanticide victims represented up to 5.5% of the offspring born during the study, and they accounted for up to 21% of infant mortality. The overall rates of infanticide were 2-3 times higher in one-male groups than multimale groups, but those differences were not statistically significant. Infant mortality, the length of interbirth intervals, and the age of first reproduction were not significantly different between one-male versus multimale groups, so we found no significant fitness benefits for females to prefer multimale groups. In addition, we found limited evidence that female dispersal patterns reflect a preference for multimale groups. If the strength of selection is modest for females to avoid group disintegrations, than any preference for multimale groups may be slow to evolve. Alternatively, variability in male strength might give some one-male groups a lower infanticide risk than some multimale groups, which could explain why both types of groups remain common. © 2013 Robbins et al.
Available Materials
https://efashare.b-cdn.net/share/pmc/articles/PMC3819382/bin/pone.0078256.s001.doc
Authors & Co-Authors
Robbins, Andrew M.
Germany, Leipzig
Max-planck-institut Für Evolutionäre Anthropologie
Gray, Maryke
Rwanda, Kigali
International Gorilla Conservation Programme
Basabose, Augustin Kanyunyi
Rwanda, Kigali
International Gorilla Conservation Programme
Uwingeli, Prosper
Rwanda, Kigali
Parc National Des Volcans
Mburanumwe, Innocent
Rwanda, Gisenyi
Parc National Des Virunga-sud
Kagoda, Edwin
Uganda, Kampala
Uganda Wildlife Authority
Robbins, Martha M.
Germany, Leipzig
Max-planck-institut Für Evolutionäre Anthropologie
Statistics
Citations: 58
Authors: 7
Affiliations: 5
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0078256
e-ISSN:
19326203
Research Areas
Maternal And Child Health
Sexual And Reproductive Health
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Participants Gender
Male
Female