Publication Details

AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS

SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH

medicine

Population pharmacokinetics of linezolid in tuberculosis patients: dosing regimen simulation and target attainment analysis

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Volume 64, No. 10, Article e01174, Year 2020

The prolonged treatment duration for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) makes linezolid dosing difficult because of adverse effects associated with long-term use. We sought to find the optimal dosing regimen for linezolid across different MIC values. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from TB patients were included from Brazil, Georgia, and two U.S. sites. Population PK modeling and simulation were performed. We used an fAUC (area under the unbound drug concentration-time curve)/ MIC ratio of 119 as the PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target and minimum (trough) concentrations of drug (Cmins) of 2 and 7 mg/liter as thresholds for toxicity. The PK/PD breakpoint was defined as the highest MIC at which the probability of target attainment is 90%. A total of 104 patients with pulmonary TB were included, with a median age and weight of 37 years and 60 kg. Eighty-one percent had drug-resistant TB. The PK data were best described by a one-compartment model. The PK/PD breakpoint was 0.125 mg/liter for a total daily dose of 300 mg, while daily doses of 450 to 600 mg and 900 to 1,200 mg had PK/PD breakpoints of 0.25 and 0.50 mg/liter, respectively. The probability of achieving a Cmin of 2 mg/liter was higher when the dose was given at once than when dividing it into 2 doses. Linezolid at a daily dose of 300 mg may not be optimal. We predicted an excellent and comparable efficacy of linezolid using total daily doses of 900 and 1,200 mg for MICs of 0.5 mg/liter but with the potential for more toxicity than with 600 mg daily. The increase in Cmin was noticeable when the daily dose was divided and may incur greater toxicity.
Statistics
Citations: 27
Authors: 12
Affiliations: 8
Identifiers
Research Areas
Infectious Diseases
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study