Skip to content
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Menu
Home
About Us
Resources
Profiles Metrics
Authors Directory
Institutions Directory
Top Authors
Top Institutions
Top Sponsors
AI Digest
Contact Us
Publication Details
AFRICAN RESEARCH NEXUS
SHINING A SPOTLIGHT ON AFRICAN RESEARCH
business, management and accounting
The status quo of research on entrepreneurial orientation: Conversational landmarks and theoretical scaffolding
Journal of Business Research, Volume 128, Year 2021
Notification
URL copied to clipboard!
Description
This research aims to gain a deeper appreciation of where the entrepreneurial orientation (EO) conversation has gained momentum based upon an analysis of its key conversational landmarks and the studies which have thus far provided its principal theoretical scaffolding. Drawing upon a bibliometric analysis of 62,499 citations from all 822 publications on EO existing so far, thereby building the most comprehensive overview of EO studies collected to date, we are able to identify which studies, journals, and disciplines have offered critical landmarks within the conversation. Moreover, we categorize these influential landmark studies into four primary areas, namely “Defining pieces”, “Methods and measurement”, “Contingencies”, and “Impact”, and discuss how prominent landmarks within the EO conversation have created the current theoretical scaffolding upon which EO research is now building. Notably, our study observes Schumpeter (1934) theory of entrepreneurship and innovation as ‘creative destruction’ as well as Barney (1991) resource-based view (RBV) as landmarks within EO's present theoretical scaffolding. © 2020 The Authors
Authors & Co-Authors
Kraus, Sascha
Italy, Bolzano
Free University of Bozen-bolzano
Filser, Matthias
Switzerland, Winterthur
Zhaw Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Finland, Lappeenranta
Lut University
Stöckmann, Christoph
Austria, Seekirchen
Privatuniversität Schloss Seeburg
Statistics
Citations: 92
Authors: 3
Affiliations: 6
Identifiers
Doi:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.046
ISSN:
01482963
Study Approach
Systematic review